In the collective spirit of the novel's composition, most characters are given a democratic kind of equal space, crisscrossing each others' lives in unlikely ways. Robespierre and his father save Grant from Russian agents on a Dalmatian beach and Pagano earns a bit part in Alfred Hitchcock's
To Catch a Thief after winning a small fortune from the Vietnamese emperor, Bao Dai.
The democratisation does not stop there. Many characters have multiple identities - many voices clamouring to express their will. One of the richest and most satisfying seams mined here is the complex and often disturbed psychological continuum between Grant, his original Bristol identity, Archie Leach, his multiple screen personae, the double employed to secretly fill his shoes while he is off on the mission, and a character barely known to the world in 1954, James Bond. And in Bond we find another single name occupied by a legion of men: Sean Connery, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan.
Indeed, much fun is had with references to Ian Fleming's first Bond novel,
Casino Royale (another child of 1954). Grant finds himself reading the novel en route to Yugoslavia. He does not like what he reads. "Paragraph after paragraph of pointless details, depicting a lifestyle that struck Cary as brash and fake." The irony is that Grant was apparently one of Fleming's models for Bond.
The overlapping of narratives and names is so unlikely it becomes a kind of farce. It hurtles entertainingly towards an expected convergence that is part
It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World and part
Reservoir Dogs.
Somehow, it is Robespierre, the more traditional novelistic hero, who emerges transformed from the dark borderlands that have been mapped across the narrative by the memory of the partisans who fought to build socialist states in Yugoslavia and Italy, and by the underground trade routes of drug and cigarette smugglers. While the composition of the novel is "experimental", its narrative structure and resolution are not.
Those who know their Italian cultural landscape will recognise many of the stereotypes here. From the north come the resolutely left-wing Bolognese, and from the south the bumbling, opportunistic but well-meaning Neapolitan yokel. The impression of stereotyping is fed by characterisations that are sometimes thinner than they deserve to be (Grant's traumatised inner world is the exception). The writing often seems clipped, and there is a kind of forced proletarianism in the language that I suspect may be the result of a translation that does not do justice to the nuances of the vernacular and dialect forms of the Italian original.
The danger this kind of multiple narrative risks is of falling into the trap of unlikely historical soap opera. It is saved by being told, in the best Sterne tradition, as a shaggy dog tale with its tongue firmly in its cheek.
David Sornig lectures in professional writing at Victoria University.
Pictures: the Left-wing Bolognese (left) and the Neapolitan Yokel (right).